Appeal No. 2004-1324
Application No. 09/495,116
by the Examiner, the combination would still fall short of
teaching or suggesting the claimed authorizing the download from
the Approved Web Site and transmitting its encryption data.
Accordingly, as the Examiner has failed to set forth a prima
facie case of obviousness, we do not sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 103
rejection of 14, 15, 17-19, 21-31, 33-35, 37-43, 45-47 and 49-56
over Alles, Toader and Kupka.
CONCLUSION
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner
rejecting claims 14, 15, 17-19, 21-31, 33-35, 37-43, 45-47 and
49-56 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LANCE LEONARD BARRY ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MAHSHID D. SAADAT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
MDS/jlb
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007