Appeal No. 2004-1330
Application 09/538,089
information is utilized to complete a task in said project if the
first score is greater than the first predetermined passing
score" as claim 1 and is patentable for the same reason (Br8).
Since we disagree with this argument for the reasons stated with
respect to claim 1, the rejection of claims 8-11, 13, and 14 is
affirmed.
- 9 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007