Ex Parte Zhang - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-1608                                                         
          Application 09/752,873                                                       

          The disclosed invention pertains to a method and                             
          apparatus for accessing a cache memory.                                      
          Representative claim 5 is reproduced as follows:                             
               5.   A cache data access system, comprising:                            
                    a plurality of ways;                                               
                    decoders coupled to each of said ways, wherein each                
          decoder is to find a data location in one said plurality of ways             
          based on an address;                                                         
                    a tag unit to compare said address with a tag array and            
          to generate a hit/miss signal; and                                           
                    sense amplifiers coupled to each of said ways, wherein             
          one of said sense amplifiers is to read data from said data                  
          location if it receives said hit/miss signal as a hit,                       
                    wherein said data read by the one of the sense                     
          amplifiers is transmitted on a global bitline.                               
          The examiner relies on the following references:                             
          Brauer et al. (Brauer)        5,550,774          Aug. 27, 1996               
          Ayukawa et al. (Ayukawa)      US2002/0118591     Aug. 29, 2002               
          (effective filing date of Aug. 16, 1999)                                     
          Claims 5, 6, 8-12 and 19-26 stand rejected under                             
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As evidence of obviousness the examiner                 
          offers Brauer in view of Ayukawa.                                            
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the                         
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the             
          respective details thereof.                                                  

                                         -2-                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007