Ex Parte SEED et al - Page 5


                 Appeal No. 2004-1736                                                          Page 5                    
                 Application No. 09/243,008                                                                              

                 cite the declaration of Dr. Brian Seed, which attests to the fact that the three                        
                 amino acids do not signal, but rather anchor the chimera into the cell membrane,                        
                 and that signaling is mediated by the transmembrane domain.  Appellants                                 
                 conclude that “[a]s [the] specification provides a working example of a chimeric                        
                 receptor that signals through a transmembrane (and not an intracellular) domain,                        
                 precisely as specified by the present amended claims, the specification and the                         
                 claims, prior to the present amendments, clearly included these features; no sub-                       
                 genus has been created.”  Id. at 11.                                                                    
                        The portion of the specification that appellants cite to states:                                 
                                To identify the minimal ζ sequences necessary for cytolysis,                             
                        a series of deletion mutants were prepared in which successively                                 
                        more of the ζ intracellular domain was removed from the carboxyl                                 
                        terminus (Fig. 8A).  Most of the intracellular domain of zeta could                              
                        be removed with little consequence for cytolytic potential; the full                             
                        length chimera CD16:ζ was essentially equal in efficiency to the                                 
                        chimera deleted to residue 65, CD16:ζAsp66* (Fig. 8B).  A                                        
                        substantial decrease in cytotoxicity was observed on deletion to ζ                               
                        residue 59 (chimera CD16:ζGlu60*), and further deletion to residue                               
                        50 resulted in slightly less activity.  However, complete loss of                                
                        activity was not observed even when the intracellular domain was                                 
                        reduced to a three residue transmembrane anchor (Fig. 8B).                                       
                 Specification, page 48, lines 20-33.                                                                    
                        Appellants also rely on original claim 44 to support that it is the                              
                 transmembrane domain is capable of signaling target destruction.  See Appeal                            
                 Brief, page 9.  Original claim 44 recites:                                                              
                        A cell expressing a proteinaceous membrane-bound chimeric                                        
                        receptor, said receptor comprising (a) an extracellular portion which                            
                        is capable of specifically recognizing and binding a target cell or a                            
                        target infective agent, and (b) a transmembrane portion derived                                  
                        from a T cell receptor, a B cell receptor, or an Fc receptor which is                            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007