The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOHN R. JACOBSON and RUSSELL P. HAZARD ____________ Appeal No. 2004-1912 Application No. 09/808,584 ____________ HEARD: January 26, 2005 ____________ Before GARRIS, WARREN, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges. PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-35 and 57. A copy of claims 1, 4, 6, 8, and 10 are representative of the subject matter on appeal and are set forth below: 1. An apparatus for coating an article, said apparatus comprising: an applicator; a conveyor for sequentially transporting a plurality of articles to said applicator; andPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007