The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________ _____ Ex parte MICHAEL E. DERISO, MICHAEL J. HERRMANN, JUDY L. LAHTI, KENNETH W. MITCHELL, and JOSEPH A. LAROSA _____________ Appeal No. 2004-1959 Application No. 09/465,465 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, BARRETT, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-17, which are all of the claims pending in the present application. The disclosed invention relates to a system for delivering targeted marketing information to a customer in a variable format customer document in which stored customer information can be updated from multiple sources. After customer information isPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007