Ex Parte Martin et al - Page 9


              Appeal No. 2004-2202                                                                 Page 9                
              Application No. 10/016,324                                                                                 

              such a coating would enable the liposomes to circulate longer and reach the target                         
              tissue as taught by Klibanov.”  Id.                                                                        
                     Appellants argue that                                                                               
                     it is clear from the teaching of Klibanov et al. that the purpose of providing                      
                     a coating of hydrophilic polymer chains on a liposome is to extend the                              
                     blood circulation lifetime of the liposomes.  That is, the hydrophilic polymer                      
                     shields the liposomes from recognition and uptake by the                                            
                     reticuloendothelial system (RES) (page 324, lines 19-22).  However, the                             
                     liposomes of Mihalko et al. are administered by inhalation to the lung                              
                     (page 4, lines 16-19 and 24-27). . . .                                                              
                     . . .  [T]he liposomes of Mihalko et al. are administered by inhalation to the                      
                     lung.  The drug is released from the liposomes into the pulmonary region                            
                     of the respiratory tract by efflux from the liposome (page 25, lines 9-13)                          
                     and only the drug enters the blood for circulation (page 25, lines 17-22).                          
                     As the purpose of the liposome with a hydrophilic polymer coating is to                             
                     protect the liposome from the RES for longer circulation, one would not be                          
                     motivated to modify the liposomes of Mihalko et al. as the liposomes do                             
                     not circulate.                                                                                      
              Appeal Brief, page 7.                                                                                      
                     “In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the examiner bears the initial burden                   
              of presenting a prima facie case of obviousness. ”  In re Rijckaert, 9 F.3d 1531, 1532,                    
              28 USPQ2d 1955, 1956 (Fed. Cir. 1993).  “[T]o establish obviousness based on a                             
              combination of the elements disclosed in the prior art, there must be some motivation,                     
              suggestion or teaching of the desirability of making the specific combination that was                     
              made by the applicant.”  In re Kotzab, 217 F.3d 1365, 1369-70, 55 USPQ2d 1313, 1316                        
              (Fed. Cir. 2000).                                                                                          
                     We agree with Appellants that the examiner has not adequately explained what                        
              would have led those skilled in the art to combine the references, since Mihalko is                        
              directed to administration of liposomes by inhalation and Klibanov is directed to                          






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007