Appeal No. 2004-2202 Page 12 Application No. 10/016,324 Other Issues Appellants filed an Information Disclosure Statement on January 25, 2005. Upon return of this application, the examiner should treat the IDS as appropriate under 37 CFR § 1.97. Summary The examiner has not shown that the claimed invention is anticipated or rendered obvious by the cited references. The rejections under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(e) and 103 are reversed. REVERSED Toni R. Scheiner ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Eric Grimes ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Lora M. Green ) Administrative Patent Judge ) LG/dymPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007