Ex Parte Carlson - Page 7


                 Appeal No.  2004-2317                                                          Page 7                   
                 Application No.  09/771,938                                                                             
                 According to the examiner (Answer, page 36), “[t]he patentability of the method                         
                 of claim 31 does not lie in the method steps, which require the simple acts of                          
                 crossing corn plants, allowing progeny seed to be produced, and growing                                 
                 progeny plants from the seed….”  Therefore, as we understand this aspect of the                         
                 claimed invention (e.g., claim 31), the intent is not to claim a specific inbred corn                   
                 plant resulting from the claimed process.  See claim 31.  Instead, as we                                
                 understand it, claim 31 is drawn to a process wherein an inbred corn plant is                           
                 derived from the corn variety I015036.                                                                  
                        As appellant explains (specification, page 3),                                                   
                        The development of uniform corn plant hybrids requires the                                       
                        development of homozygous inbred plants, the crossing of these                                   
                        inbred plants, and the evaluation of the crosses. Pedigree breeding                              
                        and recurrent selection are examples of breeding methods used to                                 
                        develop inbred plants from breeding populations. Those breeding                                  
                        methods combine the genetic backgrounds from two or more inbred                                  
                        plants or various other broad-based sources into breeding pools                                  
                        from which new inbred plants are developed by selfing and                                        
                        selection of desired phenotypes. The new inbreds are crossed with                                
                        other inbred plants and the hybrids from these crosses are                                       
                        evaluated to determine which of those have commercial potential.                                 
                 We emphasize, that while “new inbreds” having commercial potential may result                           
                 from the method set forth in claim 31, the claim does not encompass any specific                        
                 plant that is produced as a result of the method.  Rather the claim encompasses                         
                 only a method of producing an inbred corn plant that is “derived” from the corn                         
                 variety I015036.  The examiner has indicated that a claim drawn to a corn plant                         
                 of the corn variety I015036 is allowable.  See e.g., claim 5, and Answer, page 2,                       
                 wherein the examiner states that claim 5 is allowed.                                                    
                          Against this backdrop, we now consider the rejections of record.                               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007