The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOHN E. HOLLAND and CONNIE W. HOLLAND ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0288 Application No. 10/075,786 ____________ HEARD: March 9, 2005 ____________ Before McQUADE, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection (mailed March 17, 2003) of claims 1 to 13 and 27 to 40, which are all of the claims pending in this application.1 We AFFIRM. 1Claims 14 to 26 were canceled subsequent to the final rejection.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007