Appeal No. 2005-0338
Application No. 10/003,840
In rejecting the remainder of the dependent claims the examiner relies upon the
combination of Reinhardt and Helman, discussed above, in combination with Oshima,
Yamazaki, Paolini, Yasui, Funyu and Choi. The examiner does not assert, nor do we
find that either Oshima, Yamazaki, Paolini, Yasui, Funyu and Choi alone or in
combination, teach or suggest modifying tags or parameters associated with the tags of
formatted information to reduce the number of bright pixels in a display as is claimed.
Accordingly, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of dependent claims 3, 5, 6, 9
through 14, 17, 18, 19, 22, 25, 27, 28, 31 through 36, 39 through 41, and 44 through 46.
In summary, we reverse the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 20, 22 through 42
and 44 through 46 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007