Ex Parte ABDELGADIR et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0339                                                        
          Application No. 09/376,039                                                  

          deposition (HDP-CVD), over the patterned conductive layer and to            
          fill the gaps between conductive lines;                                     
               leaving the deposited FSG layer exposed;                               
               chemically mechanically polishing the exposed FSG layer to             
          reduce the height of the peaks to a substantially uniform height;           
          and                                                                         
               depositing an undoped oxide layer on the exposed FSG layer             
          after the chemical mechanical polishing of the FSG layer.                   
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Lee                            6,008,120            Dec. 28, 1999           
          Usami et al. (Usami)           6,157,083            Dec.  5, 2000           
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a method of               
          making an integrated circuit by depositing a fluoro-silicate                
          glass (FSG) layer over a patterned conductive layer on a                    
          semiconductor substrate.  The FSG layer fills the gaps between              
          the conductive lines and also forms peaks of non-uniform height             
          over the conductive lines.  The FSG layer is chemically                     
          mechanically polished to reduce the height of the peaks to a                
          uniform height, and then an undoped oxide layer is deposited on             
          the exposed FSG layer.                                                      
               Appealed claims 1, 2, 4-19 and 21-28 stand rejected under              
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lee in view of                
          Usami.                                                                      

                                         -2-                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007