Appeal No. 2005-0339 Application No. 09/376,039 As a final point, we note that appellants base no argument upon objective evidence of nonobviousness, such as unexpected results. In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (effective Sep. 13, 2004; 69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (Aug. 12, 2004); 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (Sep. 7, 2004)). AFFIRMED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) CHUNG K. PAK ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) CATHERINE TIMM ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ECK:clm -6-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007