Appeal No. 2005-0347 Page 7
Application No. 09/993,335
not met his initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of anticipation, and
we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102.
Conclusion
In view of the foregoing discussion, we have not sustained the rejection
under 35 U.S.C. § 102 of claims 2-3, 6-7, 26-27, and 30-31.
REVERSED
STUART S. LEVY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MAHSHID D. SAADAT ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge) INTERFERENCES
)
)
ALLEN R. MACDONALD )
Administrative Patent Judge )
ARM/lbg
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007