Ex Parte VALLE et al - Page 3


                  Appeal No.  2005-0394                                                            Page 3                   
                  Application No.  08/940,692                                                                               
                         Claims 23-27, 29-31, 33-38, 42, 44, 46, 49 and 50 stand rejected under 35                          
                  U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Frost, Holms, Ingrahm and Saier.                                  
                         We reverse.                                                                                        
                                                      DISCUSSION                                                            
                  The Combination of Saier and Ingrahm:                                                                     
                         According to the examiner (Answer, page 4) Saier                                                   
                         teach methods of selecting a Pts-/glucose+ S. typhimurium strain                                   
                         comprising deleting the PTS genes (ptsH and ptsI), culturing the                                   
                         mutant cell using glucose as the sole available carbon source and                                  
                         selecting cells with a fast growth rate on glucose.[1]  The mutant                                 
                         cells of Saier et al. use the galactose permease for the transport of                              
                         glucose….  The fastest growth rate specifically obtained by the                                    
                         mutants of Saier et al. was 0.35/hr.  Applicants claimed methods                                   
                         recite selecting cells with a growth rate of at least 0.4/hr.                                      
                  In addition, the examiner finds (id.) Ingrahm                                                             
                         Teach that it would be advantageous to increase the supply of PEP                                  
                         in a cell used for production of a desired product, in particular                                  
                         aromatic amino acid production, by modifying an enteric bacteria                                   
                         such as E. coli to use an alternative pathway from the PTS system                                  
                         for glucose uptake such that PEP production is not obligately                                      
                         coupled to glucose transport….                                                                     
                  Based on this evidence, the examiner concludes (Answer, page 5), “one of                                  
                  ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to screen for Pts-/glucose+                           
                  cells such as those of Saier et al. with even higher growth rates than those                              
                  specifically disclosed by Saier….”  According to the examiner (id.), since Saier                          
                  “disclose cells with growth rates very close to the claimed rate of at least 0.4/hr                       
                                                                                                                            
                  1 The examiner failed to identify, and we are unable to locate, exactly where Saier specifically          
                  teaches “selecting cells with a fast growth rate on glucose.”  Upon consideration of Saier, we find       
                  that the only selection criteria reported was that the cells “grew on glucose as the sole source of       
                  carbon.”  Saier, page 512, first column.  While we recognize that Saier noted (id.) that the two          
                  strains selected for growth on glucose, happened to take up glucose “four to six times more               
                  rapidly than by the parental strains…”, we find nothing in Saier, to suggest that the cells were          
                  selected for a fast growth rate on glucose.                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007