Ex Parte Haider et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and         
                                                 is not binding precedent of the Board.                                         

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                         ____________                                                           
                       Ex parte KARL W. HAIDER, DAVID D. STEPPAN, MICHAEL E. McGREGOR,                                          
                      KERRY A. INGOLD, VINCENT M. MAUTINO and MICHAEL A. DOBRANSKY                                              
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                                     Appeal No. 2005-0528                                                       
                                                   Application No. 10/178,143                                                   
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                                           ON BRIEF                                                             
                                                         ____________                                                           
               Before TIMM, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                    
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                               



                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          
                      This appeal involves claims 6-15 which are all the claims pending in the application.  We                 
               have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                   
















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007