Ex Parte Haider et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2005-0528                                                                       Page 2                
               Application No. 10/178,143                                                                                       


                                                      INTRODUCTION                                                              
                      According to the specification, the invention relates to polyol compositions which can be                 
               used to prepare dimensionally stable, low density water-blown rigid foams having acceptable                      
               compressive strength, foams made from the polyol compositions, and processes for preparing the                   
               foams (specification, p. 1, ll. 6-14).                                                                           
                      According to the “Background of the Invention” section of the specification, rigid foam                   
               is produced by reacting a polyisocyanate with a polyol in the presence of a blowing agent                        
               (specification, p. 1, ll. 19-20).  Typically, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) have been used as                       
               blowing agents, but effort has been directed to replacing CFCs with water because water is more                  
               environmentally friendly (specification, p. 1, ll. 21-28).  The use of water as the blowing agent,               
               however, has resulted in a shrinkage problem in the foam product (specification, p. 1, l. 29 to                  
               p. 2, l. 7).  This shrinkage problem has been addressed in several ways, but each has deficiencies               
               (specification, p. 2, 8-27).  One approach has been to produce open-cell rigid polyurethane                      
               foams.  However, unlike closed-cell water blown foams, open-cell foams are poor insulators                       
               (specification, p. 2, ll. 8-13).  Appellants’ foams are closed-cell foams yet are dimensionally                  
               stable, i.e., do not shrink, and have acceptable compressive strength.  Claims 6 and 11 are further              
               illustrative of the subject matter on appeal:                                                                    













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007