Appeal No. 2005-0713
Application No. 10/153,719 Page 11
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-3, 5, and 11-
12 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Gesche and to
reject claim 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Gesche in view of Singh is affirmed. The decision of the examiner
to reject claims 1-3, 5, and 11-12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Nakano in view of Nguyen and to reject
claim 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Nakano
and Nguyen in view of Singh is reversed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection
with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
CHUNG K. PAK )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
PETER F. KRATZ )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
CATHERIN TIMM )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007