Ex Parte Kitahara et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0777                                                        
          Application No. 10/081,881                                                  

          The claimed invention solves the problem of maintaining a good              
          grip on the roll of laminate film under tension by providing a              
          groove in the shaft, with a deformable flexible tube in the                 
          groove, so that the deformable flexible tube will touch the                 
          inside of the core of the roll of film to cause tight engagement            
          between the roll and the shaft (Brief, pages 2-3).                          
               Representative independent claim 1 and dependent claim 7 are           
          reproduced below:                                                           
                    1.  A lamination apparatus to form lamination layers of           
               laminate film pasted on surfaces of printed matter,                    
               containing a shaft to support a core roll with films wound             
               therearound, wherein said shaft has a cylindrical surface              
               and an axial direction, said shaft having a groove on the              
               cylindrical surface along the axial direction where a                  
               deformable tube and having two ends is set with both ends              
               fixed by fittings.                                                     
                    7.  The lamination apparatus according to claim 1,                
               wherein said deformable tube comprises a soft vinyl.                   
               In addition to the admitted prior art as shown in Figures              
          5 through 7, as described on pages 1-4 of the specification, the            
          examiner has relied upon the following references as evidence of            
          obviousness:                                                                
          Hahn                         3,606,187              Sep. 20, 1971           
          Kataoka                      4,496,114              Jan. 29, 1985           
               The claims on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)           
          as unpatentable over Hahn or Kataoka in view of the admitted                

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007