The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0806 Application No. 10/179,8121 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before GARRIS, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection (mailed March 2, 2004) of claims 1 to 13, which are all of the claims pending in this application.2 We AFFIRM. 1 According to the appellant, this application is a continuation of Application No. 09/121,628, filed July 23, 1998, which is a continuation of Application No. 08/815,556, filed March 12, 1997. 2 Claims 6 and 9 were amended subsequent to the final rejection. This amendment overcame the rejection of claims 6 to 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 101.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007