Ex Parte Sullivan - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   


                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                ____________                                                   

                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                        Ex parte MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN                                           
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal No. 2005-0806                                              
                                           Application No. 10/179,8121                                         
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                    
                                                 ____________                                                  
             Before GARRIS, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
             NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                



                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection (mailed March 2,           
             2004) of claims 1 to 13, which are all of the claims pending in this application.2                


                   We AFFIRM.                                                                                  

                   1 According to the appellant, this application is a continuation of Application No. 09/121,628, filed
             July 23, 1998, which is a continuation of Application No. 08/815,556, filed March 12, 1997.       
                   2 Claims 6 and 9 were amended subsequent to the final rejection.  This amendment overcame the
             rejection of claims 6 to 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 101.                                                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007