Ex Parte Sharan et al - Page 3




            Appeal No. 2005-0822                                                                       
            Application No. 09/825,612                                                                 

                        forming combined gasses comprising a metal source                              
                  gas with a chemically inert energy-transfer gas;                                     
                        supplying said combined gases to said vacuum                                   
                  chamber; and                                                                         
                        igniting a plasma.                                                             
                        25.  The method in claim 24, wherein said step of                              
                  igniting a plasma comprises interacting said combined                                
                  gases.                                                                               
                        28.  A semiconductor processing method comprising                              
                  the following steps:                                                                 
                        providing a semiconductor wafer;                                               
                        subjecting said wafer to PECVD conditions in a                                 
                  chamber;                                                                             
                        forming an ionized reactant species by interacting                             
                  a metal source material with a chemically inert                                      
                  collider gas in said chamber; and                                                    
                        forming a metal-containing layer on said wafer                                 
                  from said ionized reactant species.                                                  
                  The examiner relies on the following prior art references as                         
            evidence of unpatentability:                                                               
            Chang                   6,294,466 B1                  Sep. 25, 2001                        
                                                            (filed May 1, 1998)                        
            Richard S. Muller and Theodore I. Kamins, Device Electronics for                           
            Integrated Circuits 102 (John Wiley & Sons 2nd ed. 1986)(Muller).                          





                  Claims 13 through 15, 22 through 26, and 28 on appeal stand                          
            rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Chang.                                 
            (Examiner’s answer mailed Jan. 13, 2004 at 3-5; final Office                               
            action mailed Apr. 9, 2003 at 2-3.)2  In addition, claims 16                               

                  2  It appears that the examiner inadvertently omitted claims                         
            22-26 and 28 from the statement of the rejection.  (See answer at                          

                                                  3                                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007