The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written or publication and is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ______________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ______________________ Ex parte SUSAN MARY DALUGE, GERALD WOLBERG and DOUGLAS ALAN LIVINGSTON ______________________ Appeal No. 2005-0838 Application No. 10/174,414 ______________________ ON BRIEF ______________________ Before ELLIS, MILLS and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges. ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 18-35. Claims 1-17 have been canceled, and the examiner has indicated that claims 36 and 37 are allowable (Office Action mailed July 25, 2003). As a preliminary matter, we note the appellants’ statement on page 3 of the main brief that the claims stand or fall together. Accordingly, for purposes of this appeal, we 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007