Ex Parte Moore et al - Page 3


            Appeal No. 2005-0970                                                     Page 3              
            Application No. 09/918,760                                                                   
                                              Claims 1-8                                                 
                  Narita discloses a printer feed mechanism which feeds print                            
            media in increments of less than 1 mm by controlling the current                             
            to an electromagnetic clutch, rotatably supported on a medium                                
            feed roller drive shaft, so as to cause the clutch to operate                                
            intermittently (col. 1, lines 8-11 and 54-57; col. 8, lines 8-                               
            23).                                                                                         
                  Nureki discloses a line printer having a control for a motor                           
            that rotates a platen roller that feeds print paper (col. 2,                                 
            lines 4-7).  The motor control inhibits turbulence with low power                            
            consumption by reversing the motor by a predetermined amount                                 
            before turning off the motor to stop printing, and forwardly                                 
            rotating the motor by the predetermined amount before printing is                            
            started (abstract; col. 1, line 66 - col. 2, line 3).                                        
                  The means clauses in the appellants’ claims 1-8 are                                    
            interpreted in light of the corresponding structure, material, or                            
            acts described in the appellants’ specification, and equivalents                             
            thereof.  See In re Donaldson, 16 F.3d 1189, 1193, 29 USPQ2d                                 
            1845, 1848 (Fed. Cir. 1994)(in banc).                                                        
                  The appellants’ specification discloses, in an exemplary                               
            embodiment (page 4, paragraph 12):                                                           
                  If the driven roll 12 has coasted ahead, for example,                                  
                  M steps, (where M<N) due to system backlash and load                                   
                  inertia, then the motor 11 will advance M steps until                                  
                  all the backlash has been cleared from the drive                                       
                  train 13.  Both motor 11 and driven roll 12 will then                                  
                  advance N-M steps in unison to arrive at the intended                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007