Appeal No. 2005-0971 Page 5 Application No. 10/114,392 Conclusion In view of the foregoing discussion, we have not sustained the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102 of claim 66; and we have not sustained the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 29-30, 33-38, 40-41, 46-47, 49-50, 52-57, 60-65, and 67-68. REVERSED JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ALLEN R. MACDONALD ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ARM/lbgPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007