Appeal No. 2005-0983 Application 09/923,675 f) continuing to allow the player to play out each of the subsequent initial five card hands according to the conventional manner of play of video poker; and g) when all the predetermined arrangement of cards have been matched, determining whether the player has achieved a bonus award. The examiner relies on the following references: Falciglia 5,935,002 Aug. 10, 1999 Holmes, Jr. et al. (Holmes) 5,957,774 Sep. 28, 1999 Schneider et al. (Schneider) 6,089,976 Jul. 18, 2000 Claims 1-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Holmes, Schneider and Falciglia. Reference is made to the brief and answer for the respective positions of appellants and the examiner. OPINION At the outset, we note that, in accordance with appellants’ grouping of the claims, at page 5 of the brief, all claims will stand or fall together. Accordingly, we will focus on independent claim 1. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007