Ex Parte Wood et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2005-0983                                                        
          Application 09/923,675                                                      
               f) continuing to allow the player to play out each of the              
               subsequent initial five card hands according to the                    
               conventional manner of play of video poker; and                        
               g) when all the predetermined arrangement of cards have been           
               matched, determining whether the player has achieved a                 
               bonus award.                                                           

               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
               Falciglia                     5,935,002      Aug. 10, 1999             
               Holmes, Jr. et al. (Holmes)   5,957,774      Sep. 28, 1999             
               Schneider et al. (Schneider) 6,089,976       Jul. 18, 2000             

               Claims 1-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                     
          unpatentable over Holmes, Schneider and Falciglia.                          

               Reference is made to the brief and answer for the respective           
          positions of appellants and the examiner.                                   

                                        OPINION                                       

               At the outset, we note that, in accordance with appellants’            
          grouping of the claims, at page 5 of the brief, all claims will             
          stand or fall together.  Accordingly, we will focus on                      
          independent claim 1.                                                        




                                          3                                           


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007