Appeal No. 2005-0983
Application 09/923,675
suggested any modification of Holmes to the artisan that would
have resulted in the instant claimed subject matter.
We do not find any one of the three applied references, or
any combination thereof, to have suggested the instant claimed
invention.
Accordingly, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 1-7
under 35 U.S.C. §103.
The examiner’s decision is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
EAK:pgc
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007