The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte BERND BRUCKMANN, STEFAN WOLFF, WOLFGANG HEIDER, JOACHIM JAEHME, WERNER LANGER AND HANS RENZ __________ Appeal No. 2005-1096 Application 08/894,1561 __________ HEARD: JUNE 8, 2005 __________ Before KIMLIN, OWENS and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of claims 1 to 5, 8 to 11 and 13 to 17. 2 1 Different claims from this application were the subject of Appeal No. 2000-1881. 2 According to Appellants, Brief page 2, claims 12 and 18 have been indicated as containing allowable subject matter. However, the claims stand objected to.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007