Appeal No. 2005-1108 Application No. 10/442,900 THE REJECTIONS Claims 1 through 4, 6 through 8, 10 through 12 and 20 through 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zhang. Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zhang in view of Desai. Attention is directed to the main and reply briefs (filed November 16, 2004 and February 4, 2005) and the answer (mailed December 16, 2004) for the respective positions of the appellants and the examiner regarding the merits of these rejections.2 DISCUSSION Zhang, the examiner’s primary reference, discloses a semiconductor wafer carrier used in an apparatus for removing material from the front and back surfaces of a wafer by abrading and/or chemical reaction. The apparatus 23 includes an upper platen 25, an upper polishing pad 29, a lower platen 27 and a lower polishing pad 31. The wafer carrier 21, which in use is disposed between the polishing pads, comprises a circular metal blank 32 having three openings 34 and three ring-shaped plastic 2 In the final rejection, claim 12 also stood rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite. Upon reconsideration, the examiner has withdrawn this rejection (see page 2 in the answer). 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007