Appeal No. 2005-1108
Application No. 10/442,900
Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of claims 1 and 20, and dependent claims 2
through 4, 6 through 8, 10 through 12 and 21 through 25, as being
unpatentable over Zhang.
As the examiner’s citation of Desai does not cure the
foregoing deficiencies of Zhang relative to the subject matter
recited in parent claim 1, we also shall not sustain the standing
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claim 5 as being
unpatentable over Zhang in view of Desai.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007