Ex Parte Ladwig - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2005-1243                                                                              
             Application No. 10/017,739                                                                        

                   1.  A method of monitoring a computer network for specified events                          
             at a presence, comprising:                                                                        
                   gathering heterogeneous data, as directed by the presence, at two or                        
             more remote computers and placing the gathered data in a data stream                              
             and forwarding the data stream to the presence;                                                   
                   receiving, at the presence, the at least one data stream sent from the                      
             two or more remote computers, the data stream including data                                      
             representative of events; and                                                                     
                   applying rules to the at least one data stream at the presence for                          
             sorting data representative of events and for taking one or more actions                          
             based on a specified event.                                                                       

                   The following reference is relied on by the examiner:                                       
             McCreery et al. (McCreery)                   5,787,253           July 28, 1998                    
                                                          (filing date  May 28, 1996)                          
                   Claims 1, 4-6, 8, 15-19, 22, 24, 26, 28, 31 and 32 stand rejected                           
             under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by McCreery.  Claims 2, 14,                         
             20, 23, 27 and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of                           
             obviousness, the examiner relies upon McCreery alone.                                             
                   Rather than repeat the positions of the appellant and the examiner,                         
             reference is made to the brief and reply brief for the appellant’s positions,                     
             and to the answer for the examiner’s positions.                                                   

                                                      -2-                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007