Appeal No. 2005-1243
Application No. 10/017,739
Rejection at page 5 of the answer, this is plainly taught at column 5, lines
44-57 in addition to column 6, lines 65-column 7, line 5. The entire ability
of an alarm function such as the alarm generation element 270 in Figure 2
is instructive as to this feature as well.
Thus, generally all these locations specified here plainly teach that
the specific data is gathered as directed by the Internet activity analyzer at
least in this reference. Specific packets or types of packets may be
gathered or filtered according to the general repeated teachings in
McCreery of filtering which are then selectively sorted by the user and
organized in such a manner as to eliminate undesired data. This is most
succinctly revealed in the Summary of the Invention at column 2.
The features of dependent claims 2, 4, 5, 6 and 16 in the remaining
pages of the principal brief on appeal are only generally argued not to be
taught by this reference. Each of these features of each of these claims is
asserted by the examiner in the Statement of the Rejection to have been
taught by specific portions of McCreery, which views are not challenged by
appellant in the reply brief.
In this regard, page 2 of the reply brief generally states that the
-6-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007