Appeal No. 2005-1256 Application No. 09/988,593 Since we find no prima facie case of anticipation established by the examiner, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 1-9 under 35 U.S.C. §102 (a). The examiner’s decision in reversed. REVERSED ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JEFFREY V. NASE ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) PETER F. KRATZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) EAK/vsh 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007