Ex Parte Faust et al - Page 1




                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                          
                                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                


                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                     ____________                                                          

                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                      ____________                                                         
                               Ex parte ROBERT ALLAN FAUST, KEVIN GENE KEHNE,                                              
                                       SAYILEELA NULU and GARY LEE RUZEK                                                   
                                                      ____________                                                         
                                                  Appeal No. 2005-1270                                                     
                                                Application No. 09/798,169                                                 
                                                      ____________                                                         
                                                         ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                      ____________                                                         
              Before KRASS, BARRY, and MacDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
              KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                          


                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        


                     This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-39.                                 


                     The invention pertains to saving data used in error analysis, best understood by                      
              reference to representative independent claim 9, reproduced as follows:                                      




                     9.     A method in a data processing system for saving data, the method                               
                            comprising:                                                                                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007