Ex Parte Wang - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2005-1316                                                         
          Application No. 09/735,503                                                   

               according to an orientation including all angles                        
               between 00-900 relative to an engine axial direction to                 
               thereby effect a desired percentage change in the                       
               natural frequency of the turbine bucket.                                
               6.   A method of tuning turbine bucket natural                          
               frequency comprising:                                                   
               (a) placing a crystal seed along a desired orientation                  
               including all angles between 00-900 relative to an                      
               engine axial direction; and                                             
               (b) investment casting the turbine bucket with a single                 
               crystal alloy, wherein the desired orientation is                       
               selected to tune torsional frequencies without                          
               affecting flexure frequencies and to effect a desired                   
               percentage change in the turbine bucket natural                         
               frequency.                                                              
                                      PRIOR ART                                        
               The sole prior art reference relied upon by the examiner is:            
          Gemma et al. (Gemma)          4,605,452            Aug. 12, 1986             
                                      REJECTION                                        
               Claims 1 through 4 and 6 through 8 stand rejected  under                
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by the disclosure of Gemma.                
                                       OPINION                                         
               We have carefully reviewed the claims, specification and                
          applied prior art, including all of the arguments advanced by                
          both the examiner and the appellant in support of their                      
          respective positions.  This review has led us to conclude that               
          the examiner’s Section 102 rejection is well founded.                        

                                         -3-                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007