The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JEFFREY DAVID SHELLEY and KURTIS L. BROWN ___________ Appeal No. 2005-1386 Application No. 10/010,620 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s refusal to allow claims 7 through 11, 13, 15 through 25, 27, and 29 through 38, as amended subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendment dated Jan. 20, 2004, entered as per the Advisory Action dated Feb. 3, 2004; the amendment dated Dec. 18, 2003, was refused entry by the examiner in the Advisory Action dated Jan. 15, 2004; see the Brief, page 2). Claims 7-11, 13, 15-25, 27 and 29-38 are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007