Ex Parte Eastman - Page 8



          Appeal No. 2005-1435                                                        
          Application No. 09/906,564                                                  

          1985)(Skill is presumed on the part of those practicing in the              
          art); In re Bozek, 416 F.2d 1385, 1390, 163 USPQ 545, 549 (CCPA             
          1969) (the conclusion of obviousness may be made from “common               
          knowledge and common sense” of the person of ordinary skill in              
          the art).  As is apparent from Kastl, bending plastics in                   
          general, including polycarbonate plastics, via heating is                   
          conventional.                                                               
                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               For the factual findings set forth in the Answer and above,            
          we are not persuaded by the appellant’s arguments.  Thus, on this           
          record, we concur with the examiner that one of ordinary skill in           
          the art armed with the knowledge indicated supra would have been            
          led to the claimed subject matter.  Accordingly, we affirm the              
          examiner’s decision rejecting the claims on appeal under                    
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a).                                                         









                                          8                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007