Appeal No. 2005-1435 Application No. 09/906,564 1985)(Skill is presumed on the part of those practicing in the art); In re Bozek, 416 F.2d 1385, 1390, 163 USPQ 545, 549 (CCPA 1969) (the conclusion of obviousness may be made from “common knowledge and common sense” of the person of ordinary skill in the art). As is apparent from Kastl, bending plastics in general, including polycarbonate plastics, via heating is conventional. CONCLUSION For the factual findings set forth in the Answer and above, we are not persuaded by the appellant’s arguments. Thus, on this record, we concur with the examiner that one of ordinary skill in the art armed with the knowledge indicated supra would have been led to the claimed subject matter. Accordingly, we affirm the examiner’s decision rejecting the claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007