Appeal No. 2005-1672 Application No. 09/833,866 ammonia solution to eliminate the meat odor associated therewith. See also Nakayama, page 3. The fowl meats can be subjected to the aqueous ammonia solution in the form of mist or spray or can be immersed in the aqueous ammonia solution. Id. As is apparent from column 1 of Roth, the fowl odor referred to in Nakayama is also related to a meat exposed to microbes. Given these teachings, we concur with the examiner that one of ordinary skill in the art would have been led to employ ammonia gas and water (moisture) to form an aqueous ammonia hydroxide solution in situ or directly introduce an aqueous ammonia solution in the manner taught by either Roth or Nakayama, with a reasonable expectation of successfully reducing microbes and fowl odors in the comminuted meat. See, e.g., In re Beattie, 974 F.2d 1309, 1312, 24 USPQ2d 1040, 1042 (Fed. Cir. 1992)(“As long as some motivation or suggestion to combine the references is provided by the prior art taken as a whole, the law does not require that the references be combined for the reasons contemplated by the inventor”). With respect to claim 22, we find that the passage of Roth referred to above implicitly teaches or suggests using solid ammonia gas (ammonia) to form an aqueous ammonia hydroxide 12Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007