Ex Parte Foster et al - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   



                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                  
                             Ex parte DONALD D. FOSTER and PHILIP L. NELSON                                    
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal No. 2005-1833                                              
                                           Application No. 10/338,337                                          
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                    
                                                 ____________                                                  
             Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
             BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                



                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 23-27,           
             30-34 and 38-42.  Claims 28, 29, 35-37 and 43, the only other claims pending in this              
             application, stand objected to as being dependent on a rejected claim.                            


                                               BACKGROUND                                                      
                   The appellants’ invention relates to a dual liquid dispenser comprising two pump            
             housings and two pump plungers for dispensing two separate liquid components from                 







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007