Appeal No. 2005-1833 Page 9 Application No. 10/338,337 formation of Castner’s cap member and pump chambers as one monolithic piece on page 11 of the brief. For the foregoing reasons, the original disclosure would not have conveyed to one of ordinary skill in the art that appellants were in possession of the invention now recited in claim 23 including, in particular, “a pump housing having a connector cap, first pump chamber and second pump chamber that are connected together as one monolithic piece,” or as now recited in claims 24-32 which depend from claim 23 and thus also include the limitation lacking support in the original disclosure.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007