Ex Parte Kissner et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                   
                  written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent                
                  of the Board.                                                                        
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                   
                                             ____________                                              
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                     
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                            
                                             ____________                                              
                        Ex parte MATTHEW S. KISSNER and KEVIN S. WEISS                                 
                                             ____________                                              
                                        Appeal No. 2005-1959                                           
                                    Application No. 09/729,394                                         
                                             ____________                                              
                                               ON BRIEF                                                
                                             ____________                                              
            Before THOMAS, KRASS, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.                             
            GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                  This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                               
            rejection of claims 1 through 10 and 12 through 18, which are all                          
            of the claims pending in this application.                                                 
                  Appellants' invention relates to a remote postage meter                              
            resetting system having rebate generating capabilities.  The                               
            rebate is calculated based on the postage refill amount                                    
            requested, and the user sets the preference for what form the                              
            rebate will take.  Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed                                  
            invention, and it reads as follows:                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007