Appeal No. 2005-1959
Application No. 09/729,394
Last, the examiner adds Engel to the combination of Sansone
and Walker to reject claims 6 and 16. Engel fails to cure the
deficiencies of Sansone and Walker described supra. Therefore,
we cannot sustain the rejection of claims 6 and 16.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 3, 4, 10,
14, and 15 under 102(b) and claims 2, 5 through 9, 12, 13, and 16
through 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
APG/rwk
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007