Appeal No. 2005-1959 Application No. 09/729,394 1. A method for generating a rebate in a postage meter resetting system, the method comprising the steps of: receiving a postage refill request at a postage data center to electronically add postage to a postage meter; determining at the postage data center a rebate value associated with the postage refill request; and sending the rebate value to a designated location, wherein the rebate value is based on the postage refill amount. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Engel et al. (Engel) 5,907,830 May 25, 1999 Sansone et al. (Sansone) 5,909,373 Jun. 01, 1999 Walker et al. (Walker) 6,018,718 Jan. 25, 2000 Claims 1, 3, 4, 10, 14, and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Sansone. Claims 2 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Sansone. Claims 5, 7 through 9, 12, 17, and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Sansone in view of Walker. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007