Ex Parte Kissner et al - Page 2



            Appeal No. 2005-1959                                                                       
            Application No. 09/729,394                                                                 

                  1. A method for generating a rebate in a postage meter                               
            resetting system, the method comprising the steps of:                                      
                  receiving a postage refill request at a postage data center                          
            to electronically add postage to a postage meter;                                          
                  determining at the postage data center a rebate value                                
            associated with the postage refill request; and                                            
                  sending the rebate value to a designated location,                                   
            wherein the rebate value is based on the postage refill amount.                            
                  The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                
            examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                             
            Engel et al. (Engel)                5,907,830               May  25, 1999                  
            Sansone et al. (Sansone)            5,909,373               Jun. 01, 1999                  
            Walker et al. (Walker)              6,018,718               Jan. 25, 2000                  
                  Claims  1, 3, 4, 10, 14, and 15 stand rejected under                                 
            35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Sansone.                                        
                  Claims 2 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                              
            being unpatentable over Sansone.                                                           
                  Claims 5, 7 through 9, 12, 17, and 18 stand rejected under                           
            35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Sansone in view of                              
            Walker.                                                                                    






                                                  2                                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007