Ex Parte Zappe - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not          
          written  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                Ex parte RAYMOND ZAPPE                                
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2005-2102                                 
                              Application No. 10/077,346                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent           
          Judges.                                                                     
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s            
          final rejection of claims 21 through 27, which are the only claims          
          pending in this application (Brief, page 2).1  We have jurisdiction         
          pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                
               According to appellant, the invention is directed to a three           
          or four layered bed liner for a truck (Brief, page 4).  Appellant           
          states that the claims stand or fall together for each separate             

               1We refer to and cite from the Brief dated July 26, 2004.              




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007