Appeal No. 2005-2353 Page 5 Application No. 10/028,860 semiconductor element. In this regard, it is possible that the solder connection between the semiconductor element and the underlying substrate would prevent the cooling fluid from directly contacting and moving laterally across the bottom surface of the semiconductor element. As such, claims 1, 2, 6, 7, 12 to 16 and 27 to 29 are not anticipated by Fujisaki. For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 2, 6, 7, 12 to 16 and 27 to 29 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed. The obviousness rejections We have also reviewed the references to Patel and Lin additionally applied in the rejection of claims 4 and 5 but find nothing therein which makes up for the deficiency of Fujisaki discussed above. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 4 and 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007