Ex Parte Cobbley et al - Page 5



          Appeal No. 2005-2526                                                        
          Application No. 09/754,553                                                  

          interface (citing Figures 5-7, and data entry area 68, at column 5,         
          lines 35-50, wherein the data entry area 68 comprises “Seattle,             
          WA,” “Tokyo,” the data selection arrow, and the images of the               
          clocks representing the data entered by the user).  The examiner            
          recognizes that Vale did not teach moving the data entry area on            
          the user interface to display the keyboard image, but the examiner          
          cited Zellweger for a teaching of adding more data to the display           
          and moving the data in area 150 of Figure 13, in order to                   
          accommodate area 158 of Figure 14 without obstructing any displayed         
          area (citing Figures 13 and 14, and column 2, lines 29-39, and 49-          
          50, as well as column 11, lines 13-29 and column 12, lines 33-38).          

               The examiner concluded that the artisan would have found it            
          obvious to incorporate the feature of Zellweger, wherein data is            
          added to a display and a data area is moved, into Vale “because in          
          Vale the images of the clocks are removed from the display.  It             
          would be desirable to be able to keep them on the display.  For             
          example shrinking, compressing, or repositioning the image area             
          (also taught by Zellweger, see col. 2, lines 29-39 and lines 49-50)         
          would affect this” (answer-page 3).                                         



                                          5                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007