Appeal No. 2005-2526
Application No. 09/754,553
been established by the examiner and we will not sustain the
rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Since independent
claims 7 and 13 contain a similar limitation, we will not sustain
the rejection of any of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Assuming, arguendo, however, that Zellweger did provide for a
movement of a data entry area, we also do not find the requisite
motivation for modifying Vale with the teachings of Zellweger. In
other words, merely because Zellweger moves text in order to
accommodate other text, we find nothing in such a teaching which
would have led the artisan to modify Vale such that a data entry
area in Vale should be moved to accommodate the display of a soft
keyboard in such a manner so as not to overlay the data entry area.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007