Appeal No. 2005-2533
Application No. 09/976,559
THE REFERENCES
The references relied upon by the examiner are:
Mitra 5,998,235 Dec. 7, 1999
Rosbeck et al. (Rosbeck) 5,466,953 Nov. 14, 1995
Cockrum et al. (Cockrum) 4,956,304 Sep. 11, 1990
Irvine et al. (Irvine) 4,566,918 Jan. 28, 1986
THE REJECTIONS AT ISSUE
Claims 28, 29, 31, 32, 41, 42, and 44 through 46 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Cockrum.
Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 14, 15, and 17 through 19 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Cockrum in view of Rosbeck.
Claims 30, 33, 35 through 40, 43, 47, and 49 through 54 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Cockrum in view of Mitra.
Claims 3, 6, 8 through 13, 16, 20, and 22 through 27 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Cockrum in view of Rosbeck and
Mitra.
Claims 33, 34, 37, 39, 40, 47, 48, 51, 53, and 54 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Cockrum in view of Irvine.
Claims 6, 7, 10, 12, 13, 20, 21, 24, 26, and 27 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Cockrum in view of Rosbeck and Irvine.
-3-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007