Ex Parte Birmingham - Page 3




                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on inventorship as to Count 3 (Paper 1,                                
              page 7) is awarded against Junior Party Michael Birmingham.                                                 
                     FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Michael Birmingham is not entitled to a                            
              patent containing claim 3 (corresponding to Count 3) of patent 6,689,219.                                   
                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on inventorship as to Count 4 (Paper 1,                                
              page 7) is awarded against Junior Party Michael Birmingham.                                                 
                     FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Michael Birmingham is not entitled to a                            
              patent containing claim 4 (corresponding to Count 4) of patent 6,689,219.                                   
                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on inventorship as to Count 5 (Paper 1,                                
              page 8) is awarded against Junior Party Michael Birmingham.                                                 
                     FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Michael Birmingham is not entitled to a                            
              patent containing claim 5 (corresponding to Count 5) of patent 6,689,219.                                   
                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on inventorship as to Count 6 (Paper 1,                                
              page 9) is awarded against Junior Party Michael Birmingham.                                                 
                     FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Michael Birmingham is not entitled to a                            
              patent containing claim 6 (corresponding to Count 6) of patent 6,689,219.                                   
                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on inventorship as to Count 7 (Paper 1,                                
              page 9) is awarded against Junior Party Michael Birmingham.                                                 
                     FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Michael Birmingham is not entitled to a                            
              patent containing claim 7 (corresponding to Count 7) of patent 6,689,219.                                   
                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on inventorship as to Count 8 (Paper 1,                                
              page 10) is awarded against Junior Party Michael Birmingham.                                                


                                                           −3−                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007