Ex Parte Birmingham - Page 4




                     FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Michael Birmingham is not entitled to a                            
              patent containing claim 8 (corresponding to Count 8) of patent 6,689,219.                                   
                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on inventorship as to Count 9 (Paper 1,                                
              page 10) is awarded against Junior Party Michael Birmingham.                                                
                     FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Michael Birmingham is not entitled to a                            
              patent containing claim 9 (corresponding to Count 9) of patent 6,689,219.                                   
                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on inventorship as to Count 10 (Paper 1,                               
              page 11) is awarded against Junior Party Michael Birmingham.                                                
                     FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Michael Birmingham is not entitled to a                            
              patent containing claim 10 (corresponding to Count 10) of patent 6,689,219.                                 
                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on inventorship as to Count 11 (Paper 1,                               
              page 12) is awarded against Junior Party Michael Birmingham.                                                
                     FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Michael Birmingham is not entitled to a                            
              patent containing claim 11 (corresponding to Count 11) of patent 6,689,219.                                 
                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on inventorship as to Count 12 (Paper 1,                               
              page 11) is awarded against Junior Party Michael Birmingham.                                                
                     FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Michael Birmingham is not entitled to a                            
              patent containing claim 12 (corresponding to Count 12) of patent 6,689,219.                                 
                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on inventorship as to Count 13 (Paper 1,                               
              page 13) is awarded against Junior Party Michael Birmingham.                                                
                     FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Michael Birmingham is not entitled to a                            
              patent containing claim 13 (corresponding to Count 13) of patent 6,689,219.                                 


                                                           −4−                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007