Ex Parte Birmingham - Page 5




                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on inventorship as to Count 14 (Paper 1,                               
              page 13) is awarded against Junior Party Michael Birmingham.                                                
                     FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Michael Birmingham is not entitled to a                            
              patent containing claim 14 (corresponding to Count 14) of patent 6,689,219.                                 
                     FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on inventorship as to Count 15 (Paper 1,                               
              page 14) is awarded against Junior Party Michael Birmingham.                                                
                     FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Michael Birmingham is not entitled to a                            
              patent containing claim 15 (corresponding to Count 15) of patent 6,689,219.                                 
                     FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in files of                        
              application 09/693,214 and patent 6,689,219.                                                                
                     FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall direct attention to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c)                        
              and 37 CFR § 41.205(a) regarding the filing of settlement agreements.                                       


                             /Jameson Lee/    )                                                                           
                            ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE    )                                                              
                              )                                                                                           
                                     )                                                                                    
                             /Michael P. Tierney/   )  BOARD OF PATENT                                                    
                            ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE     )   APPEALS AND                                               
                                  )  INTERFERENCES                                                                        
                                                                       )                                                  
                 /James T. Moore/    )                                                                                    
                            ADMINISTRATIVE PATENT JUDGE    )                                                              
                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                         






                                                           −5−                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007